I like the thought of changing Dockerfile to another name. My one
concern is trying to figure out how much of a pain point it would be for
people with existing Dockerfiles to rename them. Yeah, they could use
'--file Dockerfile' to make it work, but that might be painful too if
they've a bunch of scripts buried away without that option already
specified.
But perhaps I'm being over concerned.
t
On 09/13/2019 12:52 PM, Aric Renzo wrote:
My gut instinct is that "imagefile" has a connotation with
media-type
image file formats. Might be confusing especially for non-technical
users when talking about container concepts. Open to it, if others
disagree.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:32 PM Robert P. J. Day
<rpjday(a)crashcourse.ca <mailto:rpjday@crashcourse.ca>> wrote:
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, Bryan Hepworth wrote:
> Liking the clarity of calling it a containerfile I must admit.
would it not more properly be called an "imagefile"?
rday
_______________________________________________
Podman mailing list -- podman(a)lists.podman.io
<mailto:podman@lists.podman.io>
To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave(a)lists.podman.io
<mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
--
*Aric A. Renzo*
15511 Troubadour Lane
Huntersville, NC 28078
843-609-7642 <sip:8436097642>
_______________________________________________
Podman mailing list -- podman(a)lists.podman.io
To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave(a)lists.podman.io