I like the thought of changing Dockerfile to another name.  My one concern is trying to figure out how much of a pain point it would be for people with existing Dockerfiles to rename them.  Yeah, they could use '--file Dockerfile' to make it work, but that might be painful too if they've a bunch of scripts buried away without that option already specified. 

But perhaps I'm being over concerned.

t


On 09/13/2019 12:52 PM, Aric Renzo wrote:
My gut instinct is that "imagefile" has a connotation with media-type image file formats. Might be confusing especially for non-technical users when talking about container concepts. Open to it, if others disagree.

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:32 PM Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, Bryan Hepworth wrote:

> Liking the clarity of calling it a containerfile I must admit.

  would it not more properly be called an "imagefile"?

rday
_______________________________________________
Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io
To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io


--
Aric A. Renzo
15511 Troubadour Lane
Huntersville, NC 28078


_______________________________________________
Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io
To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io