I like the thought of changing Dockerfile to another name. My one concern is trying to figure out how much of a pain point it would be for people with existing Dockerfiles to rename them. Yeah, they could use '--file Dockerfile' to make it work, but that might be painful too if they've a bunch of scripts buried away without that option already specified. But perhaps I'm being over concerned. t On 09/13/2019 12:52 PM, Aric Renzo wrote:
My gut instinct is that "imagefile" has a connotation with media-type image file formats. Might be confusing especially for non-technical users when talking about container concepts. Open to it, if others disagree.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:32 PM Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca <mailto:rpjday@crashcourse.ca>> wrote:
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, Bryan Hepworth wrote:
> Liking the clarity of calling it a containerfile I must admit.
would it not more properly be called an "imagefile"?
rday _______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
-- *Aric A. Renzo* 15511 Troubadour Lane Huntersville, NC 28078 843-609-7642 <sip:8436097642>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io