I like the thought too. That said, I think there are few major options:
1. Docker Inc. would have to donate the Dockerfile syntax to the OCI
project. Who knows, it's a possibility, but I have my doubts:
http://crunchtools.com/docker-support/
2. Create a new syntax, and donate it to the OCI
3. Copy the current Dockerfile syntax (aka fork it), and donate it to the
OCI
4. Create a new syntax, that is project based and not part of the OCI
(least favorite)
My 2c....
Best Regards
Scott M
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:20 PM Aric Renzo <aricrenzo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think that has to do with it being more of a cultural change rather
than
a code change. I think as long as Podman/Buildah support both filenames by
default,it would be the users choice about what to name the files. If they
wanted to make their project less visually tied to Docker, they could use
Containerfile, or if they wanted to keep things as-is and slowly move
things over (or never move things), that's fine too. I think it'll be up to
us to promote the use of "Containerfile" as a specification for using this
format in a vendor-neutral way. The OCI folks in their IRC channel pointed
me to
https://buildpacks.io/ as a CNCF project for creating a
abstracted universal build standard for OCI images. I think it's a great
idea, but I really couldn't see many organizations being able to quickly
turn over their container infrastructure to use buildpacks as opposed to
the Dockerfile-type format.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:58 PM Tom Sweeney <tsweeney(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I like the thought of changing Dockerfile to another name. My one
> concern is trying to figure out how much of a pain point it would be for
> people with existing Dockerfiles to rename them. Yeah, they could use
> '--file Dockerfile' to make it work, but that might be painful too if
> they've a bunch of scripts buried away without that option already
> specified.
>
> But perhaps I'm being over concerned.
>
> t
>
>
> On 09/13/2019 12:52 PM, Aric Renzo wrote:
>
> My gut instinct is that "imagefile" has a connotation with media-type
> image file formats. Might be confusing especially for non-technical users
> when talking about container concepts. Open to it, if others disagree.
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:32 PM Robert P. J. Day <rpjday(a)crashcourse.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, Bryan Hepworth wrote:
>>
>> > Liking the clarity of calling it a containerfile I must admit.
>>
>> would it not more properly be called an "imagefile"?
>>
>> rday
>> _______________________________________________
>> Podman mailing list -- podman(a)lists.podman.io
>> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave(a)lists.podman.io
>>
>
>
> --
> *Aric A. Renzo*
> 15511 Troubadour Lane
> Huntersville, NC 28078
> 843-609-7642
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Podman mailing list -- podman(a)lists.podman.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave(a)lists.podman.io
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Podman mailing list -- podman(a)lists.podman.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave(a)lists.podman.io
>
--
*Aric A. Renzo*
15511 Troubadour Lane
Huntersville, NC 28078
843-609-7642
_______________________________________________
Podman mailing list -- podman(a)lists.podman.io
To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave(a)lists.podman.io
--
--
Scott McCarty, RHCA
Product Management - Containers, Red Hat Enterprise Linux & OpenShift
Email: smccarty(a)redhat.com
Phone: 312-660-3535
Cell: 330-807-1043
Web:
http://crunchtools.com
Have questions on Red Hat UBI? Check out the official FAQ:
https://red.ht/2yaUcez