7:27 a.m.
On 11/3/23 11:11, Chris Evich wrote:
Since nobody else replied, I'll do my best, though I'm not an
expert
in this area.
Podman has a `--requires` option which you can use to define start
dependencies. IIRC, I opened an RFE a long while ago to have this
apply (in reverse) on pod-stop. I don't think that was ever
implemented, and I don't think the dependency resolution goes beyond a
single level. But don't take my word for it, you'll need to do some
experiementing.
Another idea (again, I'm not 100%): I'm pretty sure both quadlet and
kube-yaml support proper startup/shutdown dependencies and sequencing.
If either are an option in your use-case, I would highly suggest
considering them. Esp. quadlet, we get a lot of positive feedback
about it.
---
Chris Evich (he/him), RHCA III
Senior Quality Assurance Engineer
If there's a "hard-way", I'm the first one to implement it.
On 11/1/23 11:25, Михаил Иванов wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I want to create a pod, containers of which depend on the order
> in which they are started. When the pod is created the order is
> defined by container run commands. But what will happen when I stop
> the pod with 'pod stop' command and then start it up using 'pod
start'
> again? What will be the order of containers startup?
>
> And another issue: if I run the container with --restart=on-failure,
> will it be working as expected inside a pod?
>
> Best regards,
> --
>
> Michael Ivanov
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Podman mailing list -- podman(a)lists.podman.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave(a)lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________
Podman mailing list -- podman(a)lists.podman.io
To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave(a)lists.podman.io