12:01 p.m.
Thanks for your response. I'm not aware if anyone has approached the OCI
about it. Maybe I can hop on their mailing lists or open a github issue
and see. I thought about using something like: Podmanfile, Podfile, or
Buildahfile, but I think that kind of defeats the purpose of creating a
format that's project-agnostic. I think Containerfile might be general
enough that any project can adopt it be it Docker, Podman, or some other
future project that provides an interface into the OpenContainers stack.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:14 AM Tristan Cacqueray <tdecacqu(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:48 Aric Renzo wrote:
> I am open to thoughts and feedback regarding this. I'm wondering if
using
> a standard like this while great for Podman/Buildah to adopt is more of
an
> open container initiative community discussion as well? I'm curious about
> what the Podman community thinks?
>
Containerfile sounds like a great idea. I sometime name those
Buildahfile and run `buildah bud -f Buildahfile`.
Has the Dockerfile specification ever been proposed to opencontainers?
-Tristan
--
*Aric A. Renzo*
15511 Troubadour Lane
Huntersville, NC 28078
843-609-7642