[Podman] Re: GitHub Actions using podman?

Scott, My understanding is that GitHub offers "GitHub-hosted" where GitHub (the company) provides the hardware and software for runners on these platforms: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-github-hosted-runners/about-gith... These platforms are Ubuntu, macOS, Windows. RHEL is not in that list. However, GitHub also offers "self-hosted" runners, where the user provides the hardware for the runner. The supported platforms for "self-hosted" runners are: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/hosting-your-own-runners/about-self-ho... RHEL and Centos *are* in that list. In terms of the GitHub Actions, for running podman, my opinion is that it would be ideal if these Actions could: 1. Work well on "GitHub-hosted" or "self-hosted" runners on Ubuntu, RHEL, or Centos 2. Be well documented, with docs that show up quickly via web search, and are as good as the docs from GitHub/Docker: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/publishing-packages/publishing-docker-... A few of the "stretch" goals that you mentioned: 1. Actions should move from https://github.com/redhat-actions to https://github.com/containers and be maintained by the community. I see value in that, since it would be nice to have an active community-maintained Actions. However, if these actions remain where they are and don't move for a while, that's probably OK. 2. "GitHub-hosted" runners should offer RHEL alongside Ubuntu. That would probably involve a longer discussion between GitHub and Red Hat. I see value in this, but this is not important to me since I am not using RHEL at the moment. However, since RHEL *is* supported for "self-hosted" runners, the priority to move forward on this might be -- Craig On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 5:53 AM Scott McCarty <smccarty(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: