2:01 p.m.
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020, Seth Kenlon wrote:
From my experience as a writer for https://opensource.com, I would
say that the term "container" is as potent (if not more, these days)
as "Docker". It didn't used to be that way, but if I post something
about containers now, I don't see an appreciable difference in
engagement between what we used to get for articles about Docker
specifically.
I don't have numerical data to support this, and it could be an
anomaly with just my audience, so take it with a grain of salt.
I do think mentioning both docker and podman in the course title
could be good as a catch-all, but I guess I'm suggesting you ride on
the term "container", and mention podman, dockerfile, buildah, and
all those predictable SEO terms in the course description.
eggcellent ... that's the way i was leaning, i just didn't want to
alienate people who thought docker was the be-all and end-all of
container technology. i suspect the only important distinction i'd
make would be the cgroups v1/v2 issue, and make sure attendees
understand what it means, and leave it at that.
thank you kindly.
rday