9:20 a.m.
Hey folks,
I'd like to help with this, I'm also running podman on risc-v sbc's these
days and so far archlinux is the only one that works.
Happy to start an issue with the points mentioned here and I can then
slowly try these features out and document them.
Regards,
Leon
On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 11:52 PM David Hummel <lemmuh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Documentation-Driven Development (DDD) could be a useful paradigm
here.
Don't consider a feature complete, that is don't merge any PRs, until the
corresponding documentation for that feature has also been added and
reviewed.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 1:32 PM Tobias Wendorff <
tobias.wendorff(a)tu-dortmund.de> wrote:
> Am 2024-08-09 15:57, schrieb JK Laiho:
> >
> > Using modern Podman features requires scrounging together information
> > from scattered sources (the docs site, RedHat blogs, this mailing
> > list, Reddit, GitHub issues...) plus the ability to figure out what
> > info is still relevant.
>
> I have to agree here.
>
> Podman has the "disadvantage" (which is actually an advantage from a
> software point of view) that it is being actively and massively
> developed. Things change so quickly that the docs can't keep up and the
> users are left behind. And even worse: the great new features and their
> advantages often remain unrecognised because they have a one-liner
> somewhere in the changelog. That makes me sad, because the innovations
> are really cool.
>
> Perhaps AI could be used to write the commits more prominently in a
> changelog (alongside the professionally curated changelog, of course).
> _______________________________________________
> Podman mailing list -- podman(a)lists.podman.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave(a)lists.podman.io
>
_______________________________________________
Podman mailing list -- podman(a)lists.podman.io
To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave(a)lists.podman.io