On 1/18/20 2:01 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020, Seth Kenlon wrote:
From my experience as a writer for https://opensource.com, I would say that the term "container" is as potent (if not more, these days) as "Docker". It didn't used to be that way, but if I post something about containers now, I don't see an appreciable difference in engagement between what we used to get for articles about Docker specifically.
I don't have numerical data to support this, and it could be an anomaly with just my audience, so take it with a grain of salt.
I do think mentioning both docker and podman in the course title could be good as a catch-all, but I guess I'm suggesting you ride on the term "container", and mention podman, dockerfile, buildah, and all those predictable SEO terms in the course description. eggcellent ... that's the way i was leaning, i just didn't want to alienate people who thought docker was the be-all and end-all of container technology. i suspect the only important distinction i'd make would be the cgroups v1/v2 issue, and make sure attendees understand what it means, and leave it at that.
thank you kindly.
rday _______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
I think you would definitely need something on managing the Docker daemon, though. I would figure teaching both would be the best.