Podman Community Meeting - Tues June 1, 2021 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4)
Hi All, Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is coming up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman in Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link to the video conference is here (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/). Check out the link to WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend! Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 meeting. They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the video recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/ As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard from who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold the meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August 3rd, also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). t
Hi Tom and others, With 5 minutes the Open Forum seems a little short to really discuss a topic that is not on the agenda. Are there other communities or regular events (e.g. with Fedora or OCI) where people can discuss ideas and questions with video+audio and podman developers present? Some topics take just so much longer when discussed via email. How are these usually treated in this community? Best, Erik On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:08, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is coming up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman in Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link to the video conference is here (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/). Check out the link to WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend!
Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 meeting. They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the video recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/
As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard from who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold the meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August 3rd, also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4).
t _______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
On 5/27/21 09:46, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Tom and others,
With 5 minutes the Open Forum seems a little short to really discuss a topic that is not on the agenda. Are there other communities or regular events (e.g. with Fedora or OCI) where people can discuss ideas and questions with video+audio and podman developers present? Some topics take just so much longer when discussed via email. How are these usually treated in this community?
Best, Erik
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:08, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com <mailto:tom.sweeney@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is coming up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman in Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link to the video conference is here (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/ <https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/>). Check out the link to WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend!
Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 meeting. They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the video recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/ <https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/>
As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard from who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold the meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August 3rd, also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4).
t _______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
Hi Dan,
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
Thanks, I will when the time is right. Currently I'm more concerned with learning how similar requests are usually handled. Happy to read your experiences, Dan, and also other's. Best, Erik On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 16:39, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/27/21 09:46, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Tom and others,
With 5 minutes the Open Forum seems a little short to really discuss a topic that is not on the agenda. Are there other communities or regular events (e.g. with Fedora or OCI) where people can discuss ideas and questions with video+audio and podman developers present? Some topics take just so much longer when discussed via email. How are these usually treated in this community?
Best, Erik
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:08, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is coming up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman in Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link to the video conference is here (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/). Check out the link to WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend!
Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 meeting. They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the video recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/
As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard from who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold the meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August 3rd, also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4).
t _______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
For the most part we are dealling with requests via IRC and Github. In some cases we have opened up personal conversation using BlueJeans and Google Meet to discuss topics with community members. We just started doing the community meetings last year to see what the interest is and to better communicate bigger ideas with the community. Usually when we open up the discussion at the end, there is just a few questions and we have not had the need for something larger. On 5/27/21 11:48, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Dan,
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
Thanks, I will when the time is right. Currently I'm more concerned with learning how similar requests are usually handled. Happy to read your experiences, Dan, and also other's.
Best, Erik
On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 16:39, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com <mailto:dwalsh@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 5/27/21 09:46, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Tom and others,
With 5 minutes the Open Forum seems a little short to really discuss a topic that is not on the agenda. Are there other communities or regular events (e.g. with Fedora or OCI) where people can discuss ideas and questions with video+audio and podman developers present? Some topics take just so much longer when discussed via email. How are these usually treated in this community?
Best, Erik
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:08, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com <mailto:tom.sweeney@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is coming up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman in Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link to the video conference is here (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/ <https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/>). Check out the link to WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend!
Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 meeting. They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the video recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/ <https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/>
As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard from who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold the meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August 3rd, also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4).
t _______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list --podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email topodman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
Good questions Erik, First off, for the June Podman Community Meeting (PCM), we do have a bit more topics than usual for this particular meeting. In general I like to leave at least 15 minutes for the Open Forum with a 5 minute ending for the next meeting. That last 5 minutes usually gets chewed up by the Open Forum questions. I suspect that one or two of the topics might go under their allotted time and we'll regain from that. Beyond that, we generally wrap up the recorded piece of the meeting at the top of the hour, but we usually have a decent amount of folks that hang on for a bit afterwards if there's still questions floating around. As far as where to catch us outside of this meeting, the two that come to mind quickly are the devconf conferences (https://www.devconf.info/), especially so the CZ and US ones. The one in India is hard for most of us to attend due to timezones or travel distance. We also just started the Container Plumbing Days conference (https://containerplumbing.org) this past spring and plan to bring it back in Spring 2022. We also do on occasion get invited to talk on OpenShift.TV and other casts like that. I think we need to do a better job advertising our upcoming appearances (note to self) for things like that. I believe all of the maintainers are on this email list, so if you'd ever like to set up a meeting to chat, either directly to one or a few of us, just ask for a meet and we'll try our best. Or if you or others would just like a "Ask the Maintainers" type of meeting beyond the PCM, I'd be happy to set something up as called for. As Dan suggested, we're always happy taking topics for the meetings, regardless of who's presenting. So if there's something someone wants to learn more about, send an email to this list and I'll try to line up the right people for a future meeting. HTH, t On 5/27/21 11:48 AM, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Dan,
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
Thanks, I will when the time is right. Currently I'm more concerned with learning how similar requests are usually handled. Happy to read your experiences, Dan, and also other's.
Best, Erik
On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 16:39, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com <mailto:dwalsh@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 5/27/21 09:46, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Tom and others,
With 5 minutes the Open Forum seems a little short to really discuss a topic that is not on the agenda. Are there other communities or regular events (e.g. with Fedora or OCI) where people can discuss ideas and questions with video+audio and podman developers present? Some topics take just so much longer when discussed via email. How are these usually treated in this community?
Best, Erik
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:08, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com <mailto:tom.sweeney@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is coming up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman in Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link to the video conference is here (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/ <https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/>). Check out the link to WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend!
Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 meeting. They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the video recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/ <https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/>
As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard from who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold the meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August 3rd, also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4).
t _______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list --podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email topodman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
@Tom Sweeney <tsweeney@redhat.com> I think I could shorten my presentation and instead of giving a demo (which has been done already), I can give a state of affairs on where we are, what is left to be done, etc. That should free up some extra time. On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:39 AM Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/27/21 09:46, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Tom and others,
With 5 minutes the Open Forum seems a little short to really discuss a topic that is not on the agenda. Are there other communities or regular events (e.g. with Fedora or OCI) where people can discuss ideas and questions with video+audio and podman developers present? Some topics take just so much longer when discussed via email. How are these usually treated in this community?
Best, Erik
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:08, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is coming up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman in Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link to the video conference is here (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/). Check out the link to WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend!
Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 meeting. They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the video recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/
As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard from who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold the meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August 3rd, also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4).
t _______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
Brent, Thanks let's plan on dropping the demo unless there's a new twist or two from the last time. If folks still want to see the demo, perhaps you could run them through it after the Open Forum time. t On 5/27/21 1:52 PM, Brent Baude wrote:
@Tom Sweeney <mailto:tsweeney@redhat.com> I think I could shorten my presentation and instead of giving a demo (which has been done already), I can give a state of affairs on where we are, what is left to be done, etc. That should free up some extra time.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:39 AM Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com <mailto:dwalsh@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 5/27/21 09:46, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Tom and others,
With 5 minutes the Open Forum seems a little short to really discuss a topic that is not on the agenda. Are there other communities or regular events (e.g. with Fedora or OCI) where people can discuss ideas and questions with video+audio and podman developers present? Some topics take just so much longer when discussed via email. How are these usually treated in this community?
Best, Erik
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:08, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com <mailto:tom.sweeney@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is coming up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman in Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link to the video conference is here (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/ <https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/>). Check out the link to WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend!
Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 meeting. They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the video recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/ <https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/>
As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard from who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold the meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August 3rd, also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4).
t _______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list --podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email topodman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
Thanks a lot for all the inputs. From what I see, I would say that extending the Open Forum part of the meeting would require other people cutting their allotted speaking time. If they don't have much to share anyways, then that is okay. But usually that doesn't sound like a good exchange for me, allowing one person to speak more by decreasing what is accepted for another person. So, I was thinking. What would stop us from doing a weekly meeting that is mostly Open Forum? Then the monthly meeting would be free for the preplanned agenda items, right? Best, Erik On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 22:56, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
Brent,
Thanks let's plan on dropping the demo unless there's a new twist or two from the last time. If folks still want to see the demo, perhaps you could run them through it after the Open Forum time.
t
On 5/27/21 1:52 PM, Brent Baude wrote:
@Tom Sweeney <tsweeney@redhat.com>
I think I could shorten my presentation and instead of giving a demo (which has been done already), I can give a state of affairs on where we are, what is left to be done, etc. That should free up some extra time.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:39 AM Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/27/21 09:46, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Tom and others,
With 5 minutes the Open Forum seems a little short to really discuss a topic that is not on the agenda. Are there other communities or regular events (e.g. with Fedora or OCI) where people can discuss ideas and questions with video+audio and podman developers present? Some topics take just so much longer when discussed via email. How are these usually treated in this community?
Best, Erik
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:08, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is coming up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman in Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link to the video conference is here (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/). Check out the link to WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend!
Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 meeting. They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the video recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/
As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard from who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold the meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August 3rd, also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4).
t _______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
On 5/30/21 02:41, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Thanks a lot for all the inputs.
From what I see, I would say that extending the Open Forum part of the meeting would require other people cutting their allotted speaking time. If they don't have much to share anyways, then that is okay. But usually that doesn't sound like a good exchange for me, allowing one person to speak more by decreasing what is accepted for another person.
Mainly peoples commitment of time. We could try an IRC Meeting like this, where people could partially pay attention, but have a video meeting on a weekly basis, might be a time sync, with limited benefit.
So, I was thinking. What would stop us from doing a weekly meeting that is mostly Open Forum? Then the monthly meeting would be free for the preplanned agenda items, right?
Best, Erik
On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 22:56, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com <mailto:tom.sweeney@redhat.com>> wrote:
Brent,
Thanks let's plan on dropping the demo unless there's a new twist or two from the last time. If folks still want to see the demo, perhaps you could run them through it after the Open Forum time.
t
On 5/27/21 1:52 PM, Brent Baude wrote:
@Tom Sweeney <mailto:tsweeney@redhat.com> I think I could shorten my presentation and instead of giving a demo (which has been done already), I can give a state of affairs on where we are, what is left to be done, etc. That should free up some extra time.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:39 AM Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com <mailto:dwalsh@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 5/27/21 09:46, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Tom and others,
With 5 minutes the Open Forum seems a little short to really discuss a topic that is not on the agenda. Are there other communities or regular events (e.g. with Fedora or OCI) where people can discuss ideas and questions with video+audio and podman developers present? Some topics take just so much longer when discussed via email. How are these usually treated in this community?
Best, Erik
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:08, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com <mailto:tom.sweeney@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is coming up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman in Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link to the video conference is here (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/ <https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/>). Check out the link to WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend!
Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 meeting. They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the video recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/ <https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/>
As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard from who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold the meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August 3rd, also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4).
t _______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list --podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email topodman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
Thanks for sharing, Dan! I also want to share a worry that I have: As I was the one suggesting, I worry that the success of the idea fully depends on me doing all the work forever to keep it going, and that my success as a member of the community would be measured only in the value of that mini-project. Logically I already know that this is not the case, but I'm not always logical. Worries about weekly video call: - time commitment - personal responsibility and impact What other possible problems might we encounter? On Sun, 30 May 2021 at 13:09, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/30/21 02:41, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Thanks a lot for all the inputs.
From what I see, I would say that extending the Open Forum part of the meeting would require other people cutting their allotted speaking time. If they don't have much to share anyways, then that is okay. But usually that doesn't sound like a good exchange for me, allowing one person to speak more by decreasing what is accepted for another person.
Mainly peoples commitment of time. We could try an IRC Meeting like this, where people could partially pay attention, but have a video meeting on a weekly basis, might be a time sync, with limited benefit.
So, I was thinking. What would stop us from doing a weekly meeting that is mostly Open Forum? Then the monthly meeting would be free for the preplanned agenda items, right?
Best, Erik
On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 22:56, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
Brent,
Thanks let's plan on dropping the demo unless there's a new twist or two from the last time. If folks still want to see the demo, perhaps you could run them through it after the Open Forum time.
t
On 5/27/21 1:52 PM, Brent Baude wrote:
@Tom Sweeney <tsweeney@redhat.com>
I think I could shorten my presentation and instead of giving a demo (which has been done already), I can give a state of affairs on where we are, what is left to be done, etc. That should free up some extra time.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:39 AM Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/27/21 09:46, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Tom and others,
With 5 minutes the Open Forum seems a little short to really discuss a topic that is not on the agenda. Are there other communities or regular events (e.g. with Fedora or OCI) where people can discuss ideas and questions with video+audio and podman developers present? Some topics take just so much longer when discussed via email. How are these usually treated in this community?
Best, Erik
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:08, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is coming up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman in Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link to the video conference is here (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/). Check out the link to WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend!
Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 meeting. They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the video recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/
As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard from who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold the meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August 3rd, also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4).
t _______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
Alright, I didn't get more responses, so I think payout for invested time is the key issue. For me, Podman is a key technology that could be running everywhere, including Mars rovers, including smart phones (let's face it, Apps are basically containers), etc. Everywhere where IoT can be used podman makes sense. And the amount of IoT that surrounds us will just grow. So it's a huge project, even if it hasn't reached that scale yet in terms of daily work. Therefore, I would say that the community interaction should also be thought of in these terms. And if I look at other big projects, they often have community office hours, where users can bring in discussion topics. E.g. https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/events/office-hours.md So the value of thinking big in terms of community management is huge. But the personal time investment of individual people doesn't have to be. A few ideas: (1) The work could be split up, like cleaning the kitchen in a shared apartment (2) Users could be involved in the facilitation of individual sessions (3) One could look for other companies that would be interested enough in this project's growth to add some headcount (e.g., big customers) (4) One could find other companies that want to create something similar and keep an eye on what this project is doing (thinking Apple might be wanting to build their own container engine on their own kernel but make sure the CLI is almost identical) (5) There might be other FOSS projects that have, or could have in the future, a high dependency on Podman's success, and therefore might be interested in sharing community management resources (6) If we can think up an experiment that can show community traction (or even better: customer traction), and that experiment succeeds, then usually management is happy to add a headcount or two So, it doesn't mean that people who are busy crunching bugs would have attend an online meeting every week. What do you think about that? Do you have other ideas that I could add to the list? Best, Erik PS: I have to admit that after only getting a response from Dan, I was a little frustrated. My main intention when I started this was trying to figure out if I can use my newly acquired Agile skills in the project. But I don't think I can transfer these skills from colorful sticky notes to IRC messages. If someone has an idea who else might have tried something like that, I'm also curious to learn about it. What I am doing now with that desire is I'm looking for communities that work more with audio-visual communication anyways. And maybe there's still some opportunity to combine both through (5) in the future. On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 09:28, Erik Bernoth <erik.bernoth@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for sharing, Dan!
I also want to share a worry that I have: As I was the one suggesting, I worry that the success of the idea fully depends on me doing all the work forever to keep it going, and that my success as a member of the community would be measured only in the value of that mini-project. Logically I already know that this is not the case, but I'm not always logical.
Worries about weekly video call: - time commitment - personal responsibility and impact
What other possible problems might we encounter?
On Sun, 30 May 2021 at 13:09, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/30/21 02:41, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Thanks a lot for all the inputs.
From what I see, I would say that extending the Open Forum part of the meeting would require other people cutting their allotted speaking time. If they don't have much to share anyways, then that is okay. But usually that doesn't sound like a good exchange for me, allowing one person to speak more by decreasing what is accepted for another person.
Mainly peoples commitment of time. We could try an IRC Meeting like this, where people could partially pay attention, but have a video meeting on a weekly basis, might be a time sync, with limited benefit.
So, I was thinking. What would stop us from doing a weekly meeting that is mostly Open Forum? Then the monthly meeting would be free for the preplanned agenda items, right?
Best, Erik
On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 22:56, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
Brent,
Thanks let's plan on dropping the demo unless there's a new twist or two from the last time. If folks still want to see the demo, perhaps you could run them through it after the Open Forum time.
t
On 5/27/21 1:52 PM, Brent Baude wrote:
@Tom Sweeney <tsweeney@redhat.com>
I think I could shorten my presentation and instead of giving a demo (which has been done already), I can give a state of affairs on where we are, what is left to be done, etc. That should free up some extra time.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:39 AM Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/27/21 09:46, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Tom and others,
With 5 minutes the Open Forum seems a little short to really discuss a topic that is not on the agenda. Are there other communities or regular events (e.g. with Fedora or OCI) where people can discuss ideas and questions with video+audio and podman developers present? Some topics take just so much longer when discussed via email. How are these usually treated in this community?
Best, Erik
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:08, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is coming up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman in Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link to the video conference is here (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/). Check out the link to WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend!
Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 meeting. They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the video recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/
As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard from who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold the meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August 3rd, also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4).
t _______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
On 6/9/21 13:50, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Alright, I didn't get more responses, so I think payout for invested time is the key issue.
For me, Podman is a key technology that could be running everywhere, including Mars rovers, including smart phones (let's face it, Apps are basically containers), etc. Everywhere where IoT can be used podman makes sense. And the amount of IoT that surrounds us will just grow. So it's a huge project, even if it hasn't reached that scale yet in terms of daily work.
SGTM
Therefore, I would say that the community interaction should also be thought of in these terms. And if I look at other big projects, they often have community office hours, where users can bring in discussion topics. E.g. https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/events/office-hours.md <https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/events/office-hours.md>
So the value of thinking big in terms of community management is huge. But the personal time investment of individual people doesn't have to be. A few ideas: (1) The work could be split up, like cleaning the kitchen in a shared apartment (2) Users could be involved in the facilitation of individual sessions (3) One could look for other companies that would be interested enough in this project's growth to add some headcount (e.g., big customers) (4) One could find other companies that want to create something similar and keep an eye on what this project is doing (thinking Apple might be wanting to build their own container engine on their own kernel but make sure the CLI is almost identical) (5) There might be other FOSS projects that have, or could have in the future, a high dependency on Podman's success, and therefore might be interested in sharing community management resources (6) If we can think up an experiment that can show community traction (or even better: customer traction), and that experiment succeeds, then usually management is happy to add a headcount or two
So, it doesn't mean that people who are busy crunching bugs would have attend an online meeting every week.
What do you think about that? Do you have other ideas that I could add to the list?
Best, Erik
PS: I have to admit that after only getting a response from Dan, I was a little frustrated. My main intention when I started this was trying to figure out if I can use my newly acquired Agile skills in the project. But I don't think I can transfer these skills from colorful sticky notes to IRC messages. If someone has an idea who else might have tried something like that, I'm also curious to learn about it. What I am doing now with that desire is I'm looking for communities that work more with audio-visual communication anyways. And maybe there's still some opportunity to combine both through (5) in the future.
Sorry I did not mean to frustrate you, I am fine with this suggestion. I am just skeptical people will show up. But we can try it out. I have no idea how to setup a You Tube Channel for this or just do it with google chat or Bluejeans. Whatever is the lowest Barrier to entry. What do these teams do if noone shows up?
On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 09:28, Erik Bernoth <erik.bernoth@gmail.com <mailto:erik.bernoth@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thanks for sharing, Dan!
I also want to share a worry that I have: As I was the one suggesting, I worry that the success of the idea fully depends on me doing all the work forever to keep it going, and that my success as a member of the community would be measured only in the value of that mini-project. Logically I already know that this is not the case, but I'm not always logical.
Worries about weekly video call: - time commitment - personal responsibility and impact
What other possible problems might we encounter?
On Sun, 30 May 2021 at 13:09, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com <mailto:dwalsh@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 5/30/21 02:41, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Thanks a lot for all the inputs.
From what I see, I would say that extending the Open Forum part of the meeting would require other people cutting their allotted speaking time. If they don't have much to share anyways, then that is okay. But usually that doesn't sound like a good exchange for me, allowing one person to speak more by decreasing what is accepted for another person.
Mainly peoples commitment of time. We could try an IRC Meeting like this, where people could partially pay attention, but have a video meeting on a weekly basis, might be a time sync, with limited benefit.
So, I was thinking. What would stop us from doing a weekly meeting that is mostly Open Forum? Then the monthly meeting would be free for the preplanned agenda items, right?
Best, Erik
On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 22:56, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com <mailto:tom.sweeney@redhat.com>> wrote:
Brent,
Thanks let's plan on dropping the demo unless there's a new twist or two from the last time. If folks still want to see the demo, perhaps you could run them through it after the Open Forum time.
t
On 5/27/21 1:52 PM, Brent Baude wrote:
@Tom Sweeney <mailto:tsweeney@redhat.com> I think I could shorten my presentation and instead of giving a demo (which has been done already), I can give a state of affairs on where we are, what is left to be done, etc. That should free up some extra time.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:39 AM Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com <mailto:dwalsh@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 5/27/21 09:46, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Tom and others,
With 5 minutes the Open Forum seems a little short to really discuss a topic that is not on the agenda. Are there other communities or regular events (e.g. with Fedora or OCI) where people can discuss ideas and questions with video+audio and podman developers present? Some topics take just so much longer when discussed via email. How are these usually treated in this community?
Best, Erik
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:08, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com <mailto:tom.sweeney@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is coming up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman in Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link to the video conference is here (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/ <https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/>). Check out the link to WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend!
Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 meeting. They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the video recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/ <https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/>
As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard from who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold the meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August 3rd, also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4).
t _______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list --podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email topodman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
Sorry I did not mean to frustrate you, I am fine with this suggestion. I am just skeptical people will show up. But we can try it out. I have no idea how to setup a You Tube Channel for this or just do it with google chat or Bluejeans. Whatever is the lowest Barrier to entry.
Means a lot to read that, Dan! I wasn't frustrated with you, though, just with my inability to create more responses. Thanks a lot for sharing your thoughts!
What do these teams do if noone shows up?
How about we schedule at least two people to go in the beginning? First of all, two people get bored less often, and if a third person shows up it's also less awkward. Altogether I wouldn't worry too much. The first month maybe nobody comes because nobody knows it exists yet, but then I would expect participation to grow. Best, Erik On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 21:05, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 6/9/21 13:50, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Alright, I didn't get more responses, so I think payout for invested time is the key issue.
For me, Podman is a key technology that could be running everywhere, including Mars rovers, including smart phones (let's face it, Apps are basically containers), etc. Everywhere where IoT can be used podman makes sense. And the amount of IoT that surrounds us will just grow. So it's a huge project, even if it hasn't reached that scale yet in terms of daily work.
SGTM
Therefore, I would say that the community interaction should also be thought of in these terms. And if I look at other big projects, they often have community office hours, where users can bring in discussion topics. E.g. https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/events/office-hours.md
So the value of thinking big in terms of community management is huge. But the personal time investment of individual people doesn't have to be. A few ideas: (1) The work could be split up, like cleaning the kitchen in a shared apartment (2) Users could be involved in the facilitation of individual sessions (3) One could look for other companies that would be interested enough in this project's growth to add some headcount (e.g., big customers) (4) One could find other companies that want to create something similar and keep an eye on what this project is doing (thinking Apple might be wanting to build their own container engine on their own kernel but make sure the CLI is almost identical) (5) There might be other FOSS projects that have, or could have in the future, a high dependency on Podman's success, and therefore might be interested in sharing community management resources (6) If we can think up an experiment that can show community traction (or even better: customer traction), and that experiment succeeds, then usually management is happy to add a headcount or two
So, it doesn't mean that people who are busy crunching bugs would have attend an online meeting every week.
What do you think about that? Do you have other ideas that I could add to the list?
Best, Erik
PS: I have to admit that after only getting a response from Dan, I was a little frustrated. My main intention when I started this was trying to figure out if I can use my newly acquired Agile skills in the project. But I don't think I can transfer these skills from colorful sticky notes to IRC messages. If someone has an idea who else might have tried something like that, I'm also curious to learn about it. What I am doing now with that desire is I'm looking for communities that work more with audio-visual communication anyways. And maybe there's still some opportunity to combine both through (5) in the future.
Sorry I did not mean to frustrate you, I am fine with this suggestion. I am just skeptical people will show up. But we can try it out. I have no idea how to setup a You Tube Channel for this or just do it with google chat or Bluejeans. Whatever is the lowest Barrier to entry.
What do these teams do if noone shows up?
On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 09:28, Erik Bernoth <erik.bernoth@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for sharing, Dan!
I also want to share a worry that I have: As I was the one suggesting, I worry that the success of the idea fully depends on me doing all the work forever to keep it going, and that my success as a member of the community would be measured only in the value of that mini-project. Logically I already know that this is not the case, but I'm not always logical.
Worries about weekly video call: - time commitment - personal responsibility and impact
What other possible problems might we encounter?
On Sun, 30 May 2021 at 13:09, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/30/21 02:41, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Thanks a lot for all the inputs.
From what I see, I would say that extending the Open Forum part of the meeting would require other people cutting their allotted speaking time. If they don't have much to share anyways, then that is okay. But usually that doesn't sound like a good exchange for me, allowing one person to speak more by decreasing what is accepted for another person.
Mainly peoples commitment of time. We could try an IRC Meeting like this, where people could partially pay attention, but have a video meeting on a weekly basis, might be a time sync, with limited benefit.
So, I was thinking. What would stop us from doing a weekly meeting that is mostly Open Forum? Then the monthly meeting would be free for the preplanned agenda items, right?
Best, Erik
On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 22:56, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
Brent,
Thanks let's plan on dropping the demo unless there's a new twist or two from the last time. If folks still want to see the demo, perhaps you could run them through it after the Open Forum time.
t
On 5/27/21 1:52 PM, Brent Baude wrote:
@Tom Sweeney <tsweeney@redhat.com>
I think I could shorten my presentation and instead of giving a demo (which has been done already), I can give a state of affairs on where we are, what is left to be done, etc. That should free up some extra time.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:39 AM Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/27/21 09:46, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Tom and others,
With 5 minutes the Open Forum seems a little short to really discuss a topic that is not on the agenda. Are there other communities or regular events (e.g. with Fedora or OCI) where people can discuss ideas and questions with video+audio and podman developers present? Some topics take just so much longer when discussed via email. How are these usually treated in this community?
Best, Erik
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:08, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is coming up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman in Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link to the video conference is here (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/). Check out the link to WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend!
Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 meeting. They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the video recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/
As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard from who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold the meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August 3rd, also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4).
t _______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
Good Afternoon, Based on the discussion in the last community meeting, I have opened a ticket related kubernetes and podman: https://github.com/containers/podman.io/issues/412 Thanks, Faisal R. *E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSE:* This e-mail and the information contained in it is confidential, may be privileged and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any other person is strictly prohibited from using, disclosing, distributing or reproducing it. If you have received this communication in error, please reply by e-mail to the sender and delete or destroy all copies of this message. CLAUSE DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ POUR LES ENVOIS PAR COURRIEL Le présent courriel et les renseignements qu'il contient sont confidentiels, peuvent être protégés par le secret professionnel et sont à l'usage exclusif du (des) destinataire(s) susmentionné(s). Toute autre personne est par les présentes avisée qu'illui est strictement interdit d'en faire l'utilisation, la diffusion, la distribution ou la reproduction. Si cette transmission vous est arrivée par erreur, veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par courriel, puis effacer ou détruire toutes les copiesdu présent message. On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 8:38 AM Erik Bernoth <erik.bernoth@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry I did not mean to frustrate you, I am fine with this suggestion. I am just skeptical people will show up. But we can try it out. I have no idea how to setup a You Tube Channel for this or just do it with google chat or Bluejeans. Whatever is the lowest Barrier to entry.
Means a lot to read that, Dan! I wasn't frustrated with you, though, just with my inability to create more responses. Thanks a lot for sharing your thoughts!
What do these teams do if noone shows up?
How about we schedule at least two people to go in the beginning? First of all, two people get bored less often, and if a third person shows up it's also less awkward. Altogether I wouldn't worry too much. The first month maybe nobody comes because nobody knows it exists yet, but then I would expect participation to grow.
Best, Erik
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 21:05, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 6/9/21 13:50, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Alright, I didn't get more responses, so I think payout for invested time is the key issue.
For me, Podman is a key technology that could be running everywhere, including Mars rovers, including smart phones (let's face it, Apps are basically containers), etc. Everywhere where IoT can be used podman makes sense. And the amount of IoT that surrounds us will just grow. So it's a huge project, even if it hasn't reached that scale yet in terms of daily work.
SGTM
Therefore, I would say that the community interaction should also be thought of in these terms. And if I look at other big projects, they often have community office hours, where users can bring in discussion topics. E.g. https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/events/office-hours.md
So the value of thinking big in terms of community management is huge. But the personal time investment of individual people doesn't have to be. A few ideas: (1) The work could be split up, like cleaning the kitchen in a shared apartment (2) Users could be involved in the facilitation of individual sessions (3) One could look for other companies that would be interested enough in this project's growth to add some headcount (e.g., big customers) (4) One could find other companies that want to create something similar and keep an eye on what this project is doing (thinking Apple might be wanting to build their own container engine on their own kernel but make sure the CLI is almost identical) (5) There might be other FOSS projects that have, or could have in the future, a high dependency on Podman's success, and therefore might be interested in sharing community management resources (6) If we can think up an experiment that can show community traction (or even better: customer traction), and that experiment succeeds, then usually management is happy to add a headcount or two
So, it doesn't mean that people who are busy crunching bugs would have attend an online meeting every week.
What do you think about that? Do you have other ideas that I could add to the list?
Best, Erik
PS: I have to admit that after only getting a response from Dan, I was a little frustrated. My main intention when I started this was trying to figure out if I can use my newly acquired Agile skills in the project. But I don't think I can transfer these skills from colorful sticky notes to IRC messages. If someone has an idea who else might have tried something like that, I'm also curious to learn about it. What I am doing now with that desire is I'm looking for communities that work more with audio-visual communication anyways. And maybe there's still some opportunity to combine both through (5) in the future.
Sorry I did not mean to frustrate you, I am fine with this suggestion. I am just skeptical people will show up. But we can try it out. I have no idea how to setup a You Tube Channel for this or just do it with google chat or Bluejeans. Whatever is the lowest Barrier to entry.
What do these teams do if noone shows up?
On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 09:28, Erik Bernoth <erik.bernoth@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for sharing, Dan!
I also want to share a worry that I have: As I was the one suggesting, I worry that the success of the idea fully depends on me doing all the work forever to keep it going, and that my success as a member of the community would be measured only in the value of that mini-project. Logically I already know that this is not the case, but I'm not always logical.
Worries about weekly video call: - time commitment - personal responsibility and impact
What other possible problems might we encounter?
On Sun, 30 May 2021 at 13:09, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/30/21 02:41, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Thanks a lot for all the inputs.
From what I see, I would say that extending the Open Forum part of the meeting would require other people cutting their allotted speaking time. If they don't have much to share anyways, then that is okay. But usually that doesn't sound like a good exchange for me, allowing one person to speak more by decreasing what is accepted for another person.
Mainly peoples commitment of time. We could try an IRC Meeting like this, where people could partially pay attention, but have a video meeting on a weekly basis, might be a time sync, with limited benefit.
So, I was thinking. What would stop us from doing a weekly meeting that is mostly Open Forum? Then the monthly meeting would be free for the preplanned agenda items, right?
Best, Erik
On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 22:56, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
Brent,
Thanks let's plan on dropping the demo unless there's a new twist or two from the last time. If folks still want to see the demo, perhaps you could run them through it after the Open Forum time.
t
On 5/27/21 1:52 PM, Brent Baude wrote:
@Tom Sweeney <tsweeney@redhat.com>
I think I could shorten my presentation and instead of giving a demo (which has been done already), I can give a state of affairs on where we are, what is left to be done, etc. That should free up some extra time.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:39 AM Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/27/21 09:46, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Tom and others,
With 5 minutes the Open Forum seems a little short to really discuss a topic that is not on the agenda. Are there other communities or regular events (e.g. with Fedora or OCI) where people can discuss ideas and questions with video+audio and podman developers present? Some topics take just so much longer when discussed via email. How are these usually treated in this community?
Best, Erik
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:08, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi All, > > Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is > coming > up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 > at > 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and > will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman > in > Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link > to > the video conference is here > (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/). Check out the link > to > WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy > time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend! > > Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 > meeting. > They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the > video > recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. > https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/ > > As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard > from > who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold > the > meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August > 3rd, > also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). > > t > _______________________________________________ > Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io > To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io >
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
I know Dan replied, and I've meant to tie off with Urvashi about this next bit. We've talked about it briefly, but haven't dottted all the i's or crossed all the t's yet. What I'm suggesting to Urvashi is to covert the standup meeting that she runs for the Red Hat folks on the third Thursday of the month to an open ended standup meeting, open to anyone in the community. If people dial into the conference, we'll take any questions that we can handle in the hour that the standup runs. If no one shows, then we'll just do our usual standup. That meeting happens at 11:00 a.m. on that Thursday and I would send out reminders via this list and twitter for folks to join in. We'd probably start it in Google Meet or BlueJeans, if it got too big, we could talk about Twitch, YouTube or some other platform later. Currently the community meeting is getting about 30 to 50 attendees. Would that work? Urvashi, let's talk details? t ps. Sorry for the tardy reply, my inbox is overflowing as of late. On 6/9/21 1:50 PM, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Alright, I didn't get more responses, so I think payout for invested time is the key issue.
For me, Podman is a key technology that could be running everywhere, including Mars rovers, including smart phones (let's face it, Apps are basically containers), etc. Everywhere where IoT can be used podman makes sense. And the amount of IoT that surrounds us will just grow. So it's a huge project, even if it hasn't reached that scale yet in terms of daily work.
Therefore, I would say that the community interaction should also be thought of in these terms. And if I look at other big projects, they often have community office hours, where users can bring in discussion topics. E.g. https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/events/office-hours.md <https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/events/office-hours.md>
So the value of thinking big in terms of community management is huge. But the personal time investment of individual people doesn't have to be. A few ideas: (1) The work could be split up, like cleaning the kitchen in a shared apartment (2) Users could be involved in the facilitation of individual sessions (3) One could look for other companies that would be interested enough in this project's growth to add some headcount (e.g., big customers) (4) One could find other companies that want to create something similar and keep an eye on what this project is doing (thinking Apple might be wanting to build their own container engine on their own kernel but make sure the CLI is almost identical) (5) There might be other FOSS projects that have, or could have in the future, a high dependency on Podman's success, and therefore might be interested in sharing community management resources (6) If we can think up an experiment that can show community traction (or even better: customer traction), and that experiment succeeds, then usually management is happy to add a headcount or two
So, it doesn't mean that people who are busy crunching bugs would have attend an online meeting every week.
What do you think about that? Do you have other ideas that I could add to the list?
Best, Erik
PS: I have to admit that after only getting a response from Dan, I was a little frustrated. My main intention when I started this was trying to figure out if I can use my newly acquired Agile skills in the project. But I don't think I can transfer these skills from colorful sticky notes to IRC messages. If someone has an idea who else might have tried something like that, I'm also curious to learn about it. What I am doing now with that desire is I'm looking for communities that work more with audio-visual communication anyways. And maybe there's still some opportunity to combine both through (5) in the future.
On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 09:28, Erik Bernoth <erik.bernoth@gmail.com <mailto:erik.bernoth@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thanks for sharing, Dan!
I also want to share a worry that I have: As I was the one suggesting, I worry that the success of the idea fully depends on me doing all the work forever to keep it going, and that my success as a member of the community would be measured only in the value of that mini-project. Logically I already know that this is not the case, but I'm not always logical.
Worries about weekly video call: - time commitment - personal responsibility and impact
What other possible problems might we encounter?
On Sun, 30 May 2021 at 13:09, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com <mailto:dwalsh@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 5/30/21 02:41, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Thanks a lot for all the inputs.
From what I see, I would say that extending the Open Forum part of the meeting would require other people cutting their allotted speaking time. If they don't have much to share anyways, then that is okay. But usually that doesn't sound like a good exchange for me, allowing one person to speak more by decreasing what is accepted for another person.
Mainly peoples commitment of time. We could try an IRC Meeting like this, where people could partially pay attention, but have a video meeting on a weekly basis, might be a time sync, with limited benefit.
So, I was thinking. What would stop us from doing a weekly meeting that is mostly Open Forum? Then the monthly meeting would be free for the preplanned agenda items, right?
Best, Erik
On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 22:56, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com <mailto:tom.sweeney@redhat.com>> wrote:
Brent,
Thanks let's plan on dropping the demo unless there's a new twist or two from the last time. If folks still want to see the demo, perhaps you could run them through it after the Open Forum time.
t
On 5/27/21 1:52 PM, Brent Baude wrote:
@Tom Sweeney <mailto:tsweeney@redhat.com> I think I could shorten my presentation and instead of giving a demo (which has been done already), I can give a state of affairs on where we are, what is left to be done, etc. That should free up some extra time.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:39 AM Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com <mailto:dwalsh@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 5/27/21 09:46, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Tom and others,
With 5 minutes the Open Forum seems a little short to really discuss a topic that is not on the agenda. Are there other communities or regular events (e.g. with Fedora or OCI) where people can discuss ideas and questions with video+audio and podman developers present? Some topics take just so much longer when discussed via email. How are these usually treated in this community?
Best, Erik
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:08, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com <mailto:tom.sweeney@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is coming up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman in Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link to the video conference is here (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/ <https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/>). Check out the link to WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend!
Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 meeting. They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the video recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/ <https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/>
As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard from who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold the meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August 3rd, also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4).
t _______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list --podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email topodman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman@lists.podman.io> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io <mailto:podman-leave@lists.podman.io>
We'd probably start it in Google Meet or BlueJeans
I like that. Starting small. If Youtube streaming is rather quick and easy (which I assume), then I would like to test it unofficially on my private youtube account. If it fails it's not a big deal, because it was unofficial anyways.
Urvashi, let's talk details?
Yes, let's discuss it here and let's not dot all the i's. These details can be the agenda for the first few office hours. Best, Erik On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 00:38, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
I know Dan replied, and I've meant to tie off with Urvashi about this next bit. We've talked about it briefly, but haven't dottted all the i's or crossed all the t's yet.
What I'm suggesting to Urvashi is to covert the standup meeting that she runs for the Red Hat folks on the third Thursday of the month to an open ended standup meeting, open to anyone in the community. If people dial into the conference, we'll take any questions that we can handle in the hour that the standup runs. If no one shows, then we'll just do our usual standup. That meeting happens at 11:00 a.m. on that Thursday and I would send out reminders via this list and twitter for folks to join in.
We'd probably start it in Google Meet or BlueJeans, if it got too big, we could talk about Twitch, YouTube or some other platform later. Currently the community meeting is getting about 30 to 50 attendees.
Would that work? Urvashi, let's talk details?
t
ps. Sorry for the tardy reply, my inbox is overflowing as of late.
On 6/9/21 1:50 PM, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Alright, I didn't get more responses, so I think payout for invested time is the key issue.
For me, Podman is a key technology that could be running everywhere, including Mars rovers, including smart phones (let's face it, Apps are basically containers), etc. Everywhere where IoT can be used podman makes sense. And the amount of IoT that surrounds us will just grow. So it's a huge project, even if it hasn't reached that scale yet in terms of daily work.
Therefore, I would say that the community interaction should also be thought of in these terms. And if I look at other big projects, they often have community office hours, where users can bring in discussion topics. E.g. https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/events/office-hours.md
So the value of thinking big in terms of community management is huge. But the personal time investment of individual people doesn't have to be. A few ideas: (1) The work could be split up, like cleaning the kitchen in a shared apartment (2) Users could be involved in the facilitation of individual sessions (3) One could look for other companies that would be interested enough in this project's growth to add some headcount (e.g., big customers) (4) One could find other companies that want to create something similar and keep an eye on what this project is doing (thinking Apple might be wanting to build their own container engine on their own kernel but make sure the CLI is almost identical) (5) There might be other FOSS projects that have, or could have in the future, a high dependency on Podman's success, and therefore might be interested in sharing community management resources (6) If we can think up an experiment that can show community traction (or even better: customer traction), and that experiment succeeds, then usually management is happy to add a headcount or two
So, it doesn't mean that people who are busy crunching bugs would have attend an online meeting every week.
What do you think about that? Do you have other ideas that I could add to the list?
Best, Erik
PS: I have to admit that after only getting a response from Dan, I was a little frustrated. My main intention when I started this was trying to figure out if I can use my newly acquired Agile skills in the project. But I don't think I can transfer these skills from colorful sticky notes to IRC messages. If someone has an idea who else might have tried something like that, I'm also curious to learn about it. What I am doing now with that desire is I'm looking for communities that work more with audio-visual communication anyways. And maybe there's still some opportunity to combine both through (5) in the future.
On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 09:28, Erik Bernoth <erik.bernoth@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for sharing, Dan!
I also want to share a worry that I have: As I was the one suggesting, I worry that the success of the idea fully depends on me doing all the work forever to keep it going, and that my success as a member of the community would be measured only in the value of that mini-project. Logically I already know that this is not the case, but I'm not always logical.
Worries about weekly video call: - time commitment - personal responsibility and impact
What other possible problems might we encounter?
On Sun, 30 May 2021 at 13:09, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/30/21 02:41, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Thanks a lot for all the inputs.
From what I see, I would say that extending the Open Forum part of the meeting would require other people cutting their allotted speaking time. If they don't have much to share anyways, then that is okay. But usually that doesn't sound like a good exchange for me, allowing one person to speak more by decreasing what is accepted for another person.
Mainly peoples commitment of time. We could try an IRC Meeting like this, where people could partially pay attention, but have a video meeting on a weekly basis, might be a time sync, with limited benefit.
So, I was thinking. What would stop us from doing a weekly meeting that is mostly Open Forum? Then the monthly meeting would be free for the preplanned agenda items, right?
Best, Erik
On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 22:56, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
Brent,
Thanks let's plan on dropping the demo unless there's a new twist or two from the last time. If folks still want to see the demo, perhaps you could run them through it after the Open Forum time.
t
On 5/27/21 1:52 PM, Brent Baude wrote:
@Tom Sweeney <tsweeney@redhat.com>
I think I could shorten my presentation and instead of giving a demo (which has been done already), I can give a state of affairs on where we are, what is left to be done, etc. That should free up some extra time.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:39 AM Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/27/21 09:46, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Tom and others,
With 5 minutes the Open Forum seems a little short to really discuss a topic that is not on the agenda. Are there other communities or regular events (e.g. with Fedora or OCI) where people can discuss ideas and questions with video+audio and podman developers present? Some topics take just so much longer when discussed via email. How are these usually treated in this community?
Best, Erik
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:08, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is coming up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman in Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link to the video conference is here (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/). Check out the link to WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend!
Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 meeting. They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the video recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/
As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard from who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold the meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August 3rd, also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4).
t _______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
Hi, After multiple failed attempts to connect to #podman on https://libera.chat/, I would like to suggest something that has a way nicer UI and supports many useful features- https://discordapp.com/. Discord is a really good place to engage with people interested in FOSS. It also supports video/voice calls, something which could be useful for quick meetings. And the best part about is that one can send unlimited messages. All messages are saved in the channel and don't require manual logging or using a bot. Discord also hosts a lot of open source projects, here's a curated list on their official website: https://discord.com/open-source Getting podman or other related projects registered with discord for an official server/community can really help this project come to light and bring in more contributions! To make it even better, there are well-documented libraries written in languages like Go, Python, Haskell, etc. that wrap around Discord's API for bots providing features like hot reloading and command management. Bots can be significantly useful here as they might provide an interface to interact with Podman's documentation, look up GitHub issues/PRs/logs, set reminders about meetings, run untrusted code, etc. This is something that I have made in the past and I do believe bots can be really helpful! I mentioned all this because I think the discussion was kind of steered in a similar direction. This is just a suggestion because I find it really easy to interact with people on discord and work on projects. This might not be the case for everyone, but I do hope someone considers this. Best, Mehul McMaster University <aroram18@mcmaster.ca> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 6:16 PM Erik Bernoth <erik.bernoth@gmail.com> wrote:
We'd probably start it in Google Meet or BlueJeans
I like that. Starting small. If Youtube streaming is rather quick and easy (which I assume), then I would like to test it unofficially on my private youtube account. If it fails it's not a big deal, because it was unofficial anyways.
Urvashi, let's talk details?
Yes, let's discuss it here and let's not dot all the i's. These details can be the agenda for the first few office hours.
Best, Erik
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 00:38, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
I know Dan replied, and I've meant to tie off with Urvashi about this next bit. We've talked about it briefly, but haven't dottted all the i's or crossed all the t's yet.
What I'm suggesting to Urvashi is to covert the standup meeting that she runs for the Red Hat folks on the third Thursday of the month to an open ended standup meeting, open to anyone in the community. If people dial into the conference, we'll take any questions that we can handle in the hour that the standup runs. If no one shows, then we'll just do our usual standup. That meeting happens at 11:00 a.m. on that Thursday and I would send out reminders via this list and twitter for folks to join in.
We'd probably start it in Google Meet or BlueJeans, if it got too big, we could talk about Twitch, YouTube or some other platform later. Currently the community meeting is getting about 30 to 50 attendees.
Would that work? Urvashi, let's talk details?
t
ps. Sorry for the tardy reply, my inbox is overflowing as of late.
On 6/9/21 1:50 PM, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Alright, I didn't get more responses, so I think payout for invested time is the key issue.
For me, Podman is a key technology that could be running everywhere, including Mars rovers, including smart phones (let's face it, Apps are basically containers), etc. Everywhere where IoT can be used podman makes sense. And the amount of IoT that surrounds us will just grow. So it's a huge project, even if it hasn't reached that scale yet in terms of daily work.
Therefore, I would say that the community interaction should also be thought of in these terms. And if I look at other big projects, they often have community office hours, where users can bring in discussion topics. E.g. https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/events/office-hours.md
So the value of thinking big in terms of community management is huge. But the personal time investment of individual people doesn't have to be. A few ideas: (1) The work could be split up, like cleaning the kitchen in a shared apartment (2) Users could be involved in the facilitation of individual sessions (3) One could look for other companies that would be interested enough in this project's growth to add some headcount (e.g., big customers) (4) One could find other companies that want to create something similar and keep an eye on what this project is doing (thinking Apple might be wanting to build their own container engine on their own kernel but make sure the CLI is almost identical) (5) There might be other FOSS projects that have, or could have in the future, a high dependency on Podman's success, and therefore might be interested in sharing community management resources (6) If we can think up an experiment that can show community traction (or even better: customer traction), and that experiment succeeds, then usually management is happy to add a headcount or two
So, it doesn't mean that people who are busy crunching bugs would have attend an online meeting every week.
What do you think about that? Do you have other ideas that I could add to the list?
Best, Erik
PS: I have to admit that after only getting a response from Dan, I was a little frustrated. My main intention when I started this was trying to figure out if I can use my newly acquired Agile skills in the project. But I don't think I can transfer these skills from colorful sticky notes to IRC messages. If someone has an idea who else might have tried something like that, I'm also curious to learn about it. What I am doing now with that desire is I'm looking for communities that work more with audio-visual communication anyways. And maybe there's still some opportunity to combine both through (5) in the future.
On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 09:28, Erik Bernoth <erik.bernoth@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for sharing, Dan!
I also want to share a worry that I have: As I was the one suggesting, I worry that the success of the idea fully depends on me doing all the work forever to keep it going, and that my success as a member of the community would be measured only in the value of that mini-project. Logically I already know that this is not the case, but I'm not always logical.
Worries about weekly video call: - time commitment - personal responsibility and impact
What other possible problems might we encounter?
On Sun, 30 May 2021 at 13:09, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/30/21 02:41, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Thanks a lot for all the inputs.
From what I see, I would say that extending the Open Forum part of the meeting would require other people cutting their allotted speaking time. If they don't have much to share anyways, then that is okay. But usually that doesn't sound like a good exchange for me, allowing one person to speak more by decreasing what is accepted for another person.
Mainly peoples commitment of time. We could try an IRC Meeting like this, where people could partially pay attention, but have a video meeting on a weekly basis, might be a time sync, with limited benefit.
So, I was thinking. What would stop us from doing a weekly meeting that is mostly Open Forum? Then the monthly meeting would be free for the preplanned agenda items, right?
Best, Erik
On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 22:56, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
Brent,
Thanks let's plan on dropping the demo unless there's a new twist or two from the last time. If folks still want to see the demo, perhaps you could run them through it after the Open Forum time.
t
On 5/27/21 1:52 PM, Brent Baude wrote:
@Tom Sweeney <tsweeney@redhat.com>
I think I could shorten my presentation and instead of giving a demo (which has been done already), I can give a state of affairs on where we are, what is left to be done, etc. That should free up some extra time.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:39 AM Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 5/27/21 09:46, Erik Bernoth wrote:
Hi Tom and others,
With 5 minutes the Open Forum seems a little short to really discuss a topic that is not on the agenda. Are there other communities or regular events (e.g. with Fedora or OCI) where people can discuss ideas and questions with video+audio and podman developers present? Some topics take just so much longer when discussed via email. How are these usually treated in this community?
Best, Erik
If you want more time, please suggest a topic and specify the amount of time you would like.
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:08, Tom Sweeney <tom.sweeney@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi All, > > Just a quick note that the next Podman Community Meeting is > coming > up a week from this coming Tuesday. It will be Tuesday June 1, 2021 > at > 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). We're overloaded with topics this time and > will be talking about Podman and TYE, Podman v3.2.0 updates, Podman > in > Kubernetes and Podman Machine updates. The full agenda with the link > to > the video conference is here > (https://podman.io/community/meeting/agenda/). Check out the link > to > WorldTImeBuddy at the top of the web page for the agenda for an easy > time converter for your local time. As usual, no charge to attend! > > Also, I just posted the meeting notes from the May 2021 > meeting. > They include links to the slides on Sysbox runtime, a link to the > video > recording and my bad attempt at taking notes during the meeting. > https://podman.io/community/meeting/notes/2021-05-04/ > > As a quick note, given the number of people that we've heard > from > who will be on vacation in early July, we have decided to not hold > the > meeting that month. Our following meeting will be Tuesday August > 3rd, > also at 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4). > > t > _______________________________________________ > Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io > To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io >
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
_______________________________________________ Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
Podman mailing list -- podman@lists.podman.io To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave@lists.podman.io
participants (6)
-
Brent Baude -
Daniel Walsh -
Erik Bernoth -
Faisal Razzak -
Mehul Arora -
Tom Sweeney