On 10/26/21 2:13 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
You can check the distribution specific bug pages here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libpod <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libpod> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpod/+bugs <https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpod/+bugs>
Please use the distribution bug tracker for reporting any bugs with the packaging.
Thanks Reinhard for the comments and links (and for the packaging work too). Just to clarify, I wasn't intending to cast any ill-will at all, of course we're all a friendly community here to help. Mainly I was responding to this part of OP's request: "...reasonably complete set of container tools relative to fedora using just standard packages?" ALL downstream "standard packages" (even including Fedora to a degree) are going to lag behind upstream. Sometimes this is actually what you want (stability vs features). However, there's no practical option to have it both ways - it simply can't happen with human-level efforts. So OP's experience (as all downstream users) will heavily depend on downstream testing, and (if required) commercial support contracts. While Fedora's podman is more bleeding edge, and heavily tested as such, it cannot be a substitute for podman in a distro. offering full commercial support. -- Chris Evich (he/him), RHCA III Senior Quality Assurance Engineer My personal robot overlord told me to include this signature line.