[Podman] Re: CANCELED! Tuesday, August 1, 2023, 11:00 am EDT (UTC-4) Podman Community Meeting
by Tom Sweeney
Apologies all,
I had a dyslexic moment there. The meeting we are canceling is for
tomorrow, TUESDAY, August 1, 2023. Not Thurday.
t
On 7/31/23 13:47, Tom Sweeney wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We were down to only one topic for the meeting tomorrow, and the
> presenter isn't able to make it now due to a scheduling conflict.
> Given that, and the number of people that are enjoying some holiday
> time, we have decided to cancel the Podman Community Meeting tomorrow,
> Thursday, August 1, 2023, 11:00 am EDT. We are still planning to meet
> on Thursday August 17, 2023 at 11:00 am EDT for the Cabal meeting,
> and then on Tuesday, October 3, 2023, at 11:00 am EDT, we will hold
> the next Podman Community meeting.
>
> If you have topics for either meeting, please send them along to
> me, or add them to the agenda listed below my sig.
>
> Thanks All!
>
> t
>
> Community Meeting: https://hackmd.io/fc1zraYdS0-klJ2KJcfC7w
>
> Cabal Meeting: https://hackmd.io/gQCfskDuRLm7iOsWgH2yrg?both
>
1 year, 10 months
[Podman] CANCELED! Thursday, August 1, 2023, 11:00 am EDT (UTC-4) Podman Community Meeting
by Tom Sweeney
Hi All,
We were down to only one topic for the meeting tomorrow, and the
presenter isn't able to make it now due to a scheduling conflict. Given
that, and the number of people that are enjoying some holiday time, we
have decided to cancel the Podman Community Meeting tomorrow, Thursday,
August 1, 2023, 11:00 am EDT. We are still planning to meet on Thursday
August 17, 2023 at 11:00 am EDT for the Cabal meeting, and then on
Tuesday, October 3, 2023, at 11:00 am EDT, we will hold the next Podman
Community meeting.
If you have topics for either meeting, please send them along to
me, or add them to the agenda listed below my sig.
Thanks All!
t
Community Meeting: https://hackmd.io/fc1zraYdS0-klJ2KJcfC7w
Cabal Meeting: https://hackmd.io/gQCfskDuRLm7iOsWgH2yrg?both
1 year, 10 months
[Podman] Re: podman slowly shows logs on windows
by Александр Илюшкин
I'm getting logs as quick as it produced with simple wsl prompt command)
чт, 27 июл. 2023 г. в 17:54, Jason Greene <jason.greene(a)redhat.com>:
>
> Sorry that should have been:
>
> "podman --remote --url unix:///var/run/user/$(id -u)/podman/podman.sock logs <container>”
>
>
> On Jul 27, 2023 at 9:53:07 AM, Jason Greene <jason.greene(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> You’re welcome and thanks for the info. If, on the WSL prompt, you run:
>> "podman --remote --url /var/run/user/$(id -u)/podman/podman.sock logs <container>”
>>
>> How does the speed compare to the other two cases (direct podman command and also the windows prompt which you observed as slow)?
>>
>>
>> On Jul 27, 2023 at 9:17:19 AM, Александр Илюшкин <ailjushkin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jason, hi, thank you for your feedback. Yes, exactly, using the WSL
>>> prompt all commands work fast.
>>>
>>> чт, 27 июл. 2023 г. в 17:13, Jason Greene <jason.greene(a)redhat.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hey Александр,
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you see a difference when you run this on the WSL prompt? If you do "wsl -d podman-machine-default”, then podman logs <container>?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 21, 2023 at 2:19:01 PM, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > On 7/21/23 02:54, Александр Илюшкин wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > Hey guys, I've switched from docker to podman and I noticed that command
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > podman logs <container name> works extremely slow
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > What should be done to fix this?
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > I guess we would need to know what extremely slow means.
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > Jason, any ideas?
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> Podman mailing list -- podman(a)lists.podman.io
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave(a)lists.podman.io
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> С уважением,
>>> А.И.
>>>
--
С уважением,
А.И.
1 year, 10 months
[Podman] Re: podman slowly shows logs on windows
by Jason Greene
Hi Александр,
Which prompt/terminal are you using, do you see the same behavior on
Windows Terminal (wt.exe), powershell.exe, and cmd?
If you do a "podman machine ssh" and then podman logs at the linux prompt,
do you also see a lag?
Thanks!
On Jul 27, 2023 at 3:50:29 PM, Александр Илюшкин <ailjushkin(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'm getting logs as quick as it produced with simple wsl prompt command)
>
> чт, 27 июл. 2023 г. в 17:54, Jason Greene <jason.greene(a)redhat.com>:
>
>
> Sorry that should have been:
>
>
> "podman --remote --url unix:///var/run/user/$(id -u)/podman/podman.sock
> logs <container>”
>
>
>
> On Jul 27, 2023 at 9:53:07 AM, Jason Greene <jason.greene(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > You’re welcome and thanks for the info. If, on the WSL prompt, you run:
>
> > "podman --remote --url /var/run/user/$(id -u)/podman/podman.sock logs
> <container>”
>
> >
>
> > How does the speed compare to the other two cases (direct podman command
> and also the windows prompt which you observed as slow)?
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > On Jul 27, 2023 at 9:17:19 AM, Александр Илюшкин <ailjushkin(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> Jason, hi, thank you for your feedback. Yes, exactly, using the WSL
>
> >> prompt all commands work fast.
>
> >>
>
> >> чт, 27 июл. 2023 г. в 17:13, Jason Greene <jason.greene(a)redhat.com>:
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> Hey Александр,
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> Do you see a difference when you run this on the WSL prompt? If you do
> "wsl -d podman-machine-default”, then podman logs <container>?
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> On Jul 21, 2023 at 2:19:01 PM, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > On 7/21/23 02:54, Александр Илюшкин wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > Hey guys, I've switched from docker to podman and I noticed that
> command
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > podman logs <container name> works extremely slow
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > What should be done to fix this?
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > I guess we would need to know what extremely slow means.
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > Jason, any ideas?
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> _______________________________________________
>
> >>
>
> >> Podman mailing list -- podman(a)lists.podman.io
>
> >>
>
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave(a)lists.podman.io
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> --
>
> >> С уважением,
>
> >> А.И.
>
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> С уважением,
> А.И.
>
>
1 year, 10 months
[Podman] Re: Container health check from another container
by Александр Илюшкин
At least I tried, Valentin 😅
Yes, your interpretation is correct.
That was interesting to learn about the systemd approach.
С уважением, А. И.
вт, 21 нояб. 2023 г., 15:05 Valentin Rothberg <vrothberg(a)redhat.com>:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 11:23 AM Александр Илюшкин <ailjushkin(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I apologize if I misunderstood the question. I thought about something
>> like this.
>>
>
> Thanks! I'd prefer a text explanation as I still need to interpret the
> sketch. As far as I read it, something should be blocking on the health
> state of another container.
>
> So it's not possible for one container to know the health state of another
> container. That knowledge must either be implemented in the application
> logic *inside* the container (e.g., ping a server) or be used outside the
> containers, for instance, by moving the containers into systemd units which
> will only mark the unit as ready when the health check fired.
>
>
>> вт, 21 нояб. 2023 г. в 12:49, Valentin Rothberg <vrothberg(a)redhat.com>:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 10:12 AM Александр Илюшкин <
>> ailjushkin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> For example, you can define a custom /health API for this.
>> >>
>> >> In this API you can call and process health results from another hosts
>> you are integrating with.
>> >
>> >
>> > Can you describe the use case? I don't yet fully understand what you
>> want to do. I am a bit confused as you first mentioned "another container
>> in the same pod" and now mention "another host".
>> >
>> > Kind regards,
>> > Valentin
>> >
>> >>
>> >> С уважением, А. И.
>> >>
>> >> вт, 21 нояб. 2023 г., 11:45 Михаил Иванов <ivans(a)isle.spb.ru>:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi, is it possible to run health check on a container from another
>> container in same pod?
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>>
>> >>> Michael Ivanov
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Podman mailing list -- podman(a)lists.podman.io
>> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave(a)lists.podman.io
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Podman mailing list -- podman(a)lists.podman.io
>> >> To unsubscribe send an email to podman-leave(a)lists.podman.io
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> С уважением,
>> А.И.
>>
>
1 year, 6 months
[Podman] Re: Podman Community Meeting tomorrow, Tues June 6, 2023 11:00 a.m. EDT (UTC-4)
by Tom Sweeney
Slight adjustment, make that UTC-4 tomorrow, NOT UTC-5
t
On 6/5/23 11:16, Tom Sweeney wrote:
> The Podman Community Meeting is happening in just under 24 hours at
> 11:00 am EDT (UTC-5), tomorrow, Tuesday, June 6, 2023. Topics: ChRIS
> project demo, Quadlet demo, Podman v4.5 Demo, and Podman Desktop
> updates. Video Conferenece link on the agenda:
> https://hackmd.io/fc1zraYdS0-klJ2KJcfC7w
>
> Hope to see you there!
>
> t
>
1 year, 11 months